Wednesday, January 29, 2014

Question Paper | UPHJS Pre 2009 | Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service (Preliminary) Examination- 2009


Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service (Preliminary) Examination- 2009

Question Number: 91-100

91. For summoning an accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C.-
(A) statement under 161 Cr.P.C. is relevant
(B) statement on oath in the trial is relevant
(C) both the above statements are relevant
(D) None of the above

92. Ordinarily place of trial is-
(A) where the offence has been committed
(B) where the victim resides
(C) where the accused resides
(D) where the FIR is lodged

93. Statement under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. can be used to-
(A) corroborate the statement in court
(B) corroborate and contradict statement in court
(C) contradict the statement in court
(D) can not be utilized for any purpose

94. Before being summoned, the accused has got a right to-
(A) participate in the proceeding
(B) no right to participate in the proceeding
(C) has no right at all
(D) can watch the proceedings but can not participate

95. Inquiry is conducted by a Magistrate with a view to-
(A) find out a prima-facie case
(B) convict the accused
(C) authorize remand of the accused
(D) release the accused under Section 436

96. Warrant case means a case-
(A) in which a police officer can not arrest without warrant
(B) in which the court, in the first instance, shall issue a warrant of arrest against the accused
(C) relating to an offence punishable with imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years
(D) relating to an offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life or imprisonment for a term exceeding two years

97. When can a trial court release an accused on bail under Section 389(3) of Cr.P.C. after conviction?
(A) Where accused is on bail and imprisonment is not exceeding 3 years
(B) Where accused is on bail and imprisonment is not exceeding 5 years
(C) Where accused is on bail and imprisonment is not exceeding 7 years
(D) Where offence is exclusively bailable whether accused is on bail or not

98. Time prescribed for filing which of the followings cannot be extended or condoned by applying provisions of Section 5 of the Limitation Act?
(A) Revision under Section 115 C.P.C.
(B) Application for execution under Order XXI C.P.C.
(C) Appeal under Section 96, 100 and 104 C.P.C.
(D) Application for substitution under Order XXII C.P.C.

99. Time for instituting a suit can be enlarged by invoking which of the following provisions?
(A) Section 151 C.P.C.
(B) Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963
(C) Section 148 C.P.C.
(D) None of the above

100. An application for execution of a decree is filed with some delay i.e. beyond prescribed period of limitation-
(A) delay can be condoned by invoking Section 5 of the Limitation Act
(B) delay can be condoned under Section 148 C.P.C.
(C) delay can be condoned under the inherent powers of the court under Section 151 C.P.C.
(D) None of the above


No comments:

Post a Comment